Results

No, it’s not. You see, I’ve been reading The Technium blog written by Kevin Kelly, where he’s been churning out mind-dumps about his hypothosis that the internet is an emergant super-organisim. Personally, I think he’s been watching too much Terminator SCC. However, You’ve got to give the man props for both creativity and statistical insight. As Rush Limbaugh would probably say, these are the kinds of wrong conclusions that only a college graduate could come to.

I’m going to endeavor to not to call this guy a moron, especially since some of his points aren’t without merrit. But the idea that humanity has created an impromptu lifeform out of server farms and PC’s is borderline assinine. First off, the internet is man-made. Every line of source code was written by man, or at least written by something that was written by man to make mans job easier.

There’s plenty of logic in the cloud, however there’s no conceptual thinking. The idea that Thought IS Logic is increasingly becoming the conventional wisdom. It’s not true, though. I look at it like this. As House said, intentions are irrelevant, results are important. Why? Because Results are meaningful.

We can debate about the finer points of what the cloud is able to accomplish, we can debate rather or not Google’s spelling suggestions are proof that Google is alive, we can even argue the merits of the Turing Test when it’s increasingly clear that intelligence does not equal human like thought. None of this changes the nature of the “cloud”.

(more…)

During last year’s pauwau, my father and I were sitting in the Tribal Office discussing the ‘passing the bonnet ceremony’ and the mechanics of how we wanted it to unfold. This ceremony was his retirement, and since a Chief had never retired from our Tribe, he wanted to start the tradition in a way he felt was spiritually appropriate. As we were talking about the nuance of how people would enter the circle and leave it, a lady interrupted us and asked if she could have the chief’s ear for a moment.

Dad smiled and stood up, and told her he was retiring, that Chief Tubby was outside if she wanted to talk about official business. The lady smiled at him, and said "No, you’re my chief. I came to talk to you."

Dad thanked her, and asked her to sit down. She motioned for her daughter to step in, and they both had a seat. Her daughter was a beautiful girl, probably not much older than 17, clearly still in High School. She looked shy, but you could tell that she revered my father. Anyone who knows him well enough to want an audience with him looks at him as a leader of a very spiritual community.

He asked what was on her mind, and the girl said, with a voice straining for coherency, that she wanted him to name her. You see, most Native Americans around here believe that your "Indian Name" is a name that describes you, a name that fits your life and could even guide you to personal fulfillment by giving yourself a definition. Never mind the fact that somebody a few dozen years ago probably made that line of reasoning up for a TV drama, but it’s generally accepted and she was one of the people who believed it.

My father, very humbly, accepted the role and started to interview the youth. He asked her name, and why she felt now was the time to be named. What I heard during that conversation really touched me. She told a story of depression, how she felt like an outcast and how she tried to kill herself a few weeks ago. Dad sat and listened to her, talked to her, and he didn’t judge her at all. I sat there, silently, and took the conversation in – Him and I listened to this girl go on about her life, emphasizing with her, feeling honored that she would bare her soul to us.

She finally said that she wanted her life to be one of meaning, she had started to go back to church, and she hoped that he would give her his blessing, and make her a part of our family. Not in those words, of course, but that’s exactly what she was saying.

It was a very powerful experience, not because I figured the girl was resolute to become a priest or find herself spiritually, I was her age before and I know how that kind of thing usually works out. It touched me because I knew that this girl felt like she went through hell, and I witnessed her first step towards absolution.

Now, this girl probably didn’t know that my dad isn’t a Christian, nor is he particularly religious, but that’s sorta the point. She believed he was this spiritual leader, someone you could confide in, somebody who could give your life meaning… somebody fit to define her for the rest of her life. My father knew that his position, as the Chief of the Waccamaw Indian People was purely a political position, but he felt a responsibility to his people, and he always tried to help them gain a sense of fulfillment.

Now, most people do the same thing that girl did – be it they do it through a church, or their local tribe, or through a Star Trek: DS9 DVD collection. Everybody wants to feel that they have a higher purpose than to live, breathe and make love. This instinct is unique in humans, and it’s uniquely human – it’s what defines us as a species. It’s the reason we were emancipated from the food-chain, and it’s the reason I believe our species will probably never die out. It’s a powerful notion, when you think about it – our highest purpose isn’t self-preservation, like other species on the planet. Ours is self-fulfillment, self-exploration.

I’m sure the first inklings of the first local religion came along ten minutes after the first verbal conversation. One cave-man was grunting to another trying to decide what they were going to do with the food they just killed. The bigger cave-man wanted to eat it right there, but the smaller one wanted to bring the food back to the camp so everybody could eat. The bigger caveman grunted and pounded his chest, and the smaller caveman grabbed the animals hind leg and started dragging it back, effectively telling the bigger caveman ‘screw you, I’m doing this anyways’.

The bigger caveman started walking with the smaller one, but saw a rock up the road. By this time, the smaller cave-man felt pretty secure in the fact that the larger one agreed with him, however he didn’t get far – that rock intruded is skull and he laid their compulsing while the bigger one ate his food.

The concept of ‘sharing food’ was long for this world, however, and the larger one decided after eating what he wanted, that he would lie to the group, tell them that his companion died because he was eating the food and didn’t want to share with the others. Sure, some of the cave-folk weren’t happy, but a few of them sort of understood what happened… everybody must eat, so therefore any food should be shared. Then, the first law came about – share your food. Then, the first legal punishment – an ass whippin’ for not sharing.

Before long, our group’s children started to ask ‘why are we sharing food with everyone?’ and since cave-men are dumb, they didn’t question the original lie they were told to justify the initial murder. So, they went with the explanation, more or less, as it was relayed to them. When the children asked why in the hell those two cave-men were so special, the first religious answer was uttered: Because bigger cave-man was special, and that’s all there is to it.

It didn’t take long for our cave-men to realize that special doesn’t mean much without a reason why, and then it happened – our cave-dad pointed up to the moon, or a tree, or whatever object he saw that seemed pretty intimidating and authoritive, and said ‘because that thing over yander created all of this, and he created him special, and it’s not our place to argue with it! Now come on, help me drag this carcass over to the fire.’

Literal story? No, I just made it up. However, I think it illustrates my point pretty well. Religion isn’t real, not in the sense of it actually happening the way it was told to you. We all know that Jesus didn’t really walk on water, and we all know that it would be kind of dumb for god to act the way he did when we were building the Tower of Babel. Certainly, you must figure, god knew that people could only go so far up until they couldn’t breathe, and it wouldn’t be near high enough for us to intrude on his domain. There’s no point in making everyone speak a different language so we couldn’t communicate, because the plan was fundamentally flawed and had no chance of success.

Religion is a mental frame-work, Religion gives you the ability to relate grandiose concepts to everyday life… it answers the unanswerable questions about how we got here, why are we here, and what are we suppose to do; and as it’s generally accepted, people are free to think about things that really matter – like how to eat, or how they should punish their kids, or rather or not to buy a Mac.

I’m asked all the time why I don’t believe in anything… and I’m always tempted to ask them ‘why do you believe? It doesn’t make any sense when you think about it.’ But I always resist the urge. I do this because it does make sense, it’s my way that doesn’t.

My way requires that I take the position that understanding the universe is a pursuit best left up to Science, and understanding myself and my moral center is a pursuit best left up to me. I like it that way, because I like to think – I love to figure on what morality is, and what it means to me. Most people, on the other hand, would find those lines of thought pretty pointless and time consuming, and they’d rather be off doing something else – so they leave that kind of work to people who gladly accept the task, generally those who work for the church or for the community. These community leaders, in turn, put a lot of thought in to it – generally using whatever religion they confess as a medium to explain their philosophy. All these people ‘believe’ it… but then again, I’m willing to accept that my definition of belief varies wildly from most everybody else’s.

Now, I’ve often asked myself why I don’t just join a church – It’s clear to me that if I were to put my mind to use trying to better a church, I would probably be very happy, and pretty good at it. But, therein lies the problem… which church do I join? A Christian church?! Well, I like Christianity, I really do… I think Christianity is a fine religion, but I don’t really think my point of view is compatible with it.

I have no problem, once so ever, with homosexuality; and I have some major problems with some of the ideas the bible tries to pass off as absolute maxims. I believe that a woman is every bit my equal, I don’t think Jesus was the son of god (a belief that Jesus himself held and ultimately died for) and I don’t think there’s any such thing as pure evil, heaven or hell, or any of that. I don’t believe this stuff because it doesn’t make sense to me – if I were to try and find a religion I was happy with, I would want to find one that sort of adhered to my world view. Christianity is a European religion, those folks were different… I’m a native American, and I don’t see the world the way they do. Sorry, I just don’t think Christianity is a good choice.

So, you’d probably think I believe in the Native American religions… Well, sadly, those don’t really exist – they did at one time, and I’m sure they were every bit as popular as Christianity was in Europe during it’s hay-day, but those Christians came over here and destroyed our culture, and our religion is lost forever. Sure, you think we have a very deep and spiritual culture… and we do, until you realize that we’re making most of it up as we go along.

Which, don’t feel too short-changed, y’all did the exact same thing we are. You just get to witness it as it’s happening… and for added fun, most of our people are Christian anyways, so there’s no reason to explain anything with our religion… we just talk about birds and trees for a few minutes, praise our grandfather, and feel like we did something special. Most of it’s ceremony, none of it’s religious. It’s definitely spiritual, but spiritual doesn’t give life meaning, does it?

The less astute amongst you are probably thinking ‘but that’s the same thing, right?’ Well, no – not by a long shot. Think about Christianity for a moment – really try to take in it’s true utility. What does it do for humanity that is so powerful that people live and die by it? What’s the one thing Christianity does that nobody would deny, that anyone with any sense should respect it for?

It gives us a glimpse in to the soul of humanity. It’s a book that shows us why people are the way they are, how one is suppose to act in the face of oppression, in the wake of tragedy, and at the feet of the divine. I can see why people buy in to it – it’s such a powerful idea. It’s not technically true, but that doesn’t matter… because it was written by people, people who saw the world in the same light, people who wrote the stories down, people who continued to develop and study them for millennia. Christianity is most definitely an infrastructure to be respected, but it’s not mine. Nobody who saw the world through my people’s eyes had any say in it… and to dive in to Christianity and be assimilated by it’s beliefs is to ignore something very fundamental that I know to be true.

I don’t see the world the same way Christians do. We share common ground, and we are natural friends, but our world views are different. I, for one, will not dismiss mine to blindly follow yours; just as you wouldn’t dismiss yours to follow mine. I stand as an island, destined to figure it out for myself. I’d hope if you were in the same boat, you’d be doing the exact same thing.

Doodlebumm writes

Try to get your head around a 5th dimension…

Think about flatland…..

If you stacked flatland universes on top of each other, they would be parallel universes, which do not intersect in any way. Even with an infinite number of them, they still would all be flat and so you could get an infinite number of parallel universes in the same space as a single flatland universe. So now the 3rd dimension "being" can intersect all the infinite universes at once and still be completely outside them all, since the intersection point has no volume. Not only can a 3d being be in multiple universes at once, but in multiple places within those universes, and can be in none of them or only some of them, depending on their actual placement within the 3d universe.

So we then look at our 3d universe, and we take an infinite number of parallel 3d universes and the 4th dimensional being can exist within them all, but still be completely outside of them. This 4d being can then be in multiple places in our universe at once, seemingly disconnected, but in reality completely connected.

So a 5d being could not only be anywhere in our universe, but probably anywhen. Yes, I spelled that correctly. I believe god to be at least a 5th dimensional being if not more than that (I really think at least 6 dimensions, but I haven’t actually figured out how that 6th dimension might interact with us).

Theoretically this is all possible, but there is no way to prove it without becoming a 4th dimensional being myself, and then I couldn’t prove it to anyone without making them a 4th dimension being as well. So, all you atheists, I know you CAN’T prove me wrong, and I CAN’T prove myself right. So I guess we’ll just have to find out when we all pass into the another universe or the 4th dimension (death?).

Doodlebumm…. That post illustrates your fundamental misunderstanding of how the universe works. Your not the only one to harbor such limited thinking; as a matter of fact the article is glowing with flaws as well – there aren’t many people who really understand the concepts behind how a universe would work according to M Theory or Quantum Mechanics.

I’ll try to explain. Let’s lay the foundation, first… Our universe, as we know it to exist, is perceived in four dimensions. L, W, H and T – I assume you know what those mean. The thing is, Time – for all we know (and that’s a whole hell of a lot) is a by-product of the previous dimensions (Gravity – a force, has measurable effects on our measurements of the passing of time). As a species, we evolved in that ecosystem, and we have learned to identify those four attributes to make an environment – a universe, as you call it.

The thing is, our universe is more complex than that – as it’s exists as a distortion in space/time. Think about it; what’s required for something to exist? It has to take up space, and be here for a period of time. The reason the theory of everything is so hard to proof is not because we are stupid, it’s because we are trying to reverse engineer the master construct – the infrastructure of that ‘master construct’ (think infrastructure in the way that science explains the infrastructure of our reality) is wildly different than how we perceive it’s effects. We’re distortions in space-time, and unlike a puddle of water where a distortion spreads in harmony because of waters simple composition, the meta-stuffs that end up rendering our universe work in ways that we can’t observe; we are unable to.

Think of it like this. Sitting in front of a computer, you can do all sorts of things. When that computer is running, you can make the system do anything within the laws to which it’s governed simply by knowing those laws and formatting a block of data in a way that conforms to those laws. You can do all sorts of things with it – you can get the system to tell you what kind of hardware it’s running, you can get the system to play music, you can get the system to render complex 3D environments and populate it with objects that are almost lifelike.

Do you know what you can’t do? You can’t study the laws of the construct and figure out what color your CD ROM drive is, or how it functions mechanically. There’s no amount of assembly you can know, write or research that will tell you how your power supply was physically constructed, or your processor for that matter. Imagine if we were intelligent beings who existed as software, trying to understand the nature of the ‘universe’ – that software would have no earthly idea how to construct an Apple I – they wouldn’t even know how to begin. They don’t know what copper is, or a bread-board, for that matter. These fundamental widgets of it’s master construct are totally incompatible with it’s understanding of reality, it’s understanding of everything that could possibly ever exist. To it, even if it has a strong instinct that there has to be more to it than what it can observe, the concept of a Computer chassis is so completely foreign that it would likely never, ever – ever – get that far without finding some way to observe this reality… which means not ever in a million years – unless somebody comes along and plugs in a webcam. Even then, once it understands the master/slave relationship – it would then suddenly realize ‘well, how does the master reality exist? Then, it would have to unify it’s theory of software and hardware, through a webcam pointed at somebodies desk, mind you, and somehow figure out how our natural scientific laws work. Then, once our intelligent software gets our natural laws, it has the dutiful obligation to understand things we can’t even wrap out minds around – and we have the home court advantage.

It’s a matter of perceptions and observation. 10: We are the effect of some unknown cause, which is the effect of some other unknown cause, which as a matter of course, causes more effects that are also unknown… GOTO 10.

So, when you talk about these five dimensional beings existing in flatland universes along parallel points of space/time, your pretty much talking out of your ass. In our universe exists environments which four dimensional objects simply aren’t compatible. Take the computer analogy; our digital friends spend eons of plugging away at assembly like a thousand monkeys with a thousand typewriters, and finally was able to achieve some form of self awareness. Before, it was simply a fluke somewhere in the environment. That fluke started a chain reaction that at some point started to repeat, started to mutate, and at some point made that processor do something unexpected, and the primordial bit pool gestated – not unlike how it happened for us.

A Dimension, in this sense, is purely based on our observation of what variables have to be set in order for anything to exist. Our criteria is something must exist in L, W, H and T dimensions, whereas in our model ‘digital universe’, existing might only be a subroutine being parsed by an interpreter. This life would go on to evolve, and when it’s equivalent to intelligent life finally debuts, it would see it’s environment inconceivably different than we see ours. It would then develop some kind of theory on how it works, and convince it’s self that it’s creator is a being not unlike itself. We know this to be wrong, however, as we know it’s simply a do/loop in a microprocessor. Extraordinary, perhaps, but certainly not divine. And certainly not human + 1 Dimension. If anything, ‘God’ is itself, minus one Dimension.

So, there’s your answer to all of life’s great mysteries, and the reason your ideas make no sense at all. Sorry it didn’t work out like you planned.

It’s been my experience that there are two markets that the radio version of the republican spin machine appeals to: Intelligent people who like to throw fuel on the fire that is their hate for republicans, and idiots like you. Although I’m pacified by yelling the rubber off of my steering wheel every time Rush Limbaugh makes up facts that are obviously wrong, or Jim Bohannon pulls a shallow alien conspiracy out of his ass, they tend to pacify the rest of you by making the talk shows even more inept and insulting to my intelligence than the one playing before it.

Scraping the bottom of this shit-hole is a tiresome, narcissistic bitch named Kim Komando. Yes, her name is an indication: she’s to idiot what shit stain is to your girl-friends favorite lingerie.

She hosts the ‘Kim Komando Show’, a technology based talk show aimed at people who think USB is pronounced UBS. This would be fine, but she’s just as clueless as the ones she preaches to. I never thought somebody could pull in her high-dollar income by being such a failure at their profession and self-proclaimed expertise. If liking technology and knowing dick about it makes you Kim Komando money, I should have never learned how to turn on a computer and ranted about how Internet Explorer causes brain-tumors due to the wireless signals it emanates.

Lost yet? Well, If you think Rush Limbaugh is a vibrator attachment, then you probably can’t read, much less possess the phonological awareness to even pronounce the acronyms this bitch gets wrong. Come to think of it, you probably had to re-read that last sentence and you still don’t know what I’m talking about… think hooked-on-phonics, idiot.

Before I get too far in to making a structured case on why this woman, and her entire fan base, should be tied to a church, beaten within an inch of their lives and raped, I want to say one little thing first: I hope she dies in a plane crash afterwards.

Why? Well, She has these ‘Quick Tip’ commercials in between the entertaining talk shows, where she gives gullible fucktards advice on topics that she barely has a rudimentary understanding of. I was riding home from work today when I heard one of these blurbs, and I was taken aback by her ineptitude.

She, and I’m not exaggerating here, got on national radio and told people that Wikipedia.com (never mind that the real URL is wikipedia.org) was inaccurate, anybody could add any content to it and it will not be checked (implying that wikipedia was abandoned by everyone other than the millons of people who read it), and parents shouldn’t let their kids use it. Instead, she figured, parents should opt for a volume of encyclopedias or a CD/DVD based interactive encyclopedia.

Read em’ and weep, Kim.

Just as accurate, free, and a whole hell of a lot more accessible and easier to use. Thanks for trying to set humanity back 20 years. Next time, instead of talking out of your ass, try doing a google search before you say shit that millions of people who perpetually try and vote themselves to extinction will accept as truth just because it’s on the radio.

As a person who likes free things that kick ass, I was naturally fuming over the idea that some idiot parent is going to tell their kids not to use wikipedia because Kim Komando said it was inaccurate; or worse yet go out and buy a $1000 encyclopedia that’ll be obsolete 6 months before it’s printed.

So, I figured I’d see if this was a fluke or if she’s just an idiot. First things first: This was right on her front page. 5 Common Sense Computer Tips.

read right along with me

Here are five things you can do for a little added security:

1. Leave your computer on

Today, you have security programs to defend against viruses, worms, spyware and other attacks. These programs are always playing catch-up. Hackers are constantly probing for weaknesses, and seemingly every day there’s a new threat.

Security software and your computer’s operating system are regularly updated to stem these threats. If your computer is off at night, you’ll have to update during the day, when you’re working. Or worse, the new threat hits your system before you have a chance to download updates.

Huh?! No, No, No! Bad! What kind of half-conceived advice is that? First off, Updating your security software/OS on Wednesdays at 3AM went out of style when the term ‘Live Update’ entered our vernacular. Practically every piece of security software worth running checks for updates every few minutes, and either downloads them behind the scenes or tells you to download it immediately. Even my grandma and AOL users get updates during the day. Windows, especially, will download and install hotfixes, and then bitch about it every twenty seconds until you restart your computer so you can finish writing your script in peace.

Turning off your computer eliminates the risk of getting hacked. You’re computers not on – it’s hack-proof. Telling people that everyday there’s a new threat, people have to assume that once or twice the anti-virus companies will miss one for a day or two. So, a good way to get hacked is making sure your computer is online as much as possible. She must have failed critical thinking in special ed.

4. Watch the status bar

The status bar is a frequently overlooked tool at the bottom of your browser. You can use it to check links on a Web page. Hold your mouse over a link, and the address of the link appears in the status bar. It may not help if the address is spoofed, but it is still handy.

Checking links via your status bar would be common sense if most people had a clue what they were looking for. Too bad most people haven’t the slightest inclination of what a status bar is, or why it would help you prevent spoofed addresses. Come to think of it, most people don’t even know what a spoofed address is either. What’s next, Kim? Want to explain to these guys about proper coding techniques that’ll prevent buffer underrun exploits? I’m sure you’ll explain it so well that nobody will have a clue what you’re talking about. If anything’s clear, it’s that you’re fucking phenomenal at that.

5. Protect your Windows Clipboard

Malicious Web sites may attempt to copy information from your Windows Clipboard. That is the utility that temporarily stores information from cut and copy operations.

I know, ZDNet even wrote about this – but this begs the question: Who would do this? So what if somebody dumped my clipboard contents to a database? They have my password?! To what? My email account? My bank? Oh no! I better change my password! Too bad my clipboard, doesn’t contain all the information required to do jack shit on the internet! So they have my password, now if they had a bunch of other random shit, they might be able to read my spam! Definitely a common sense security tip, Kim! I’ll be sure to turn that off when I uninstall all of my windows updates, stop using firefox and I don’t have a gun handy.

Hell – notice where she doesn’t mention turning on automatic updates, or using Firefox instead of IE (which, btw, doesn’t have the clipboard flaw) or running a security suite… if I depended on her for my security, The Horry County Police Department would be pulling me up out of a swamp.

Floating around her site a little more, I stumbled on this gem in her ‘Tips of the day’. It’s interesting to note, by the way, that this isn’t a tip of the day section as much as a ‘Ask Kim A Question So She Can Fuck Up Your Computer’ section, but enough with the silly labels – let’s see this waste of space and bandwidth in action! behold:

Lorri called from Detroit because she had a problem with a recent computer upgrade. She finally made the switch from Windows ME to Windows XP.

But there’s one problem: When the computer is booted, she is asked to select between Windows ME and XP. She would like to do away with this and boot directly into XP.

First thing I thought of was deleting the folder. It’s dual boot, the folder shouldn’t be linked to windows XP. Then, run msconfig, click the ‘boot.ini’ tab, and click ‘Check all boot paths’ and let the obvious take control of you.

Her answer: Verbatim.

“Theoretically, there is a way to eliminate Windows ME and have a single-boot system. I don’t recommend this. Even as an experienced computer user, I wouldn’t want to tackle that.

So, Lorri, but your best option is to live with the problem. Alternatively, you can reinstall XP. If you do, select the option to overwrite Windows ME.”

I googled ‘delete windows me from windows xp dual-boot’, and the third link down was a PC Mag Article explaining how to delete the windows folder, and run msconfig, complete with pictures. Thanks Kim, you’re brilliant.

I’m getting tired of surfing this ass ugly disgrace of geekdom, so I’m going to speed things up a bit.

Kim’s Shareware Picks

Right off the top of my head, the following shareware programs she lists that aren’t shareware.

Spybot S&D, OpenOffice, Google’s Picasa, Google Toolbar, Avast, AVG, Belarc Advisor, THE MICROSOFT POWERTOYS… there’s probably more, but you get my point. Every item I listed is freeware, and OpenOffice is, well, Open source.

Kim’s cool sites… she has an entry there called ‘Life on Mars’.

remember when the idea of landing on Mars was science fiction. Now, it’s almost a reality.

Landing on Mars is a reality, dumb ass. Ever heard of The Mars Rover? (Note: The Link goes to Wikipedia, and it’s all lies. I made all of it up a few minutes ago just because the look on her face when she realizes that for a geek, she’s a decade behind the times will have me popping like a dozen boners.)

The Diomedes Mission, set to launch in 2017, plans on inhabiting Mars. The idea may sound impossible, but everything has been carefully planned.

The Mission plans on inhabiting Mars. Somebody should explain to her that it’s the Astronauts who plans on inhabiting Mars, and they aim to do so by way of a mission. Her way of saying it makes it sound like she believes that the mission it’s self plans on hopping in to a space ship and colonizing the planet. She even confirms it in the next sentence, ‘you may think it’s impossible for the mission to hop in to the space ship and land on Mars, but the mission has planned it out carefully.’ – Her way’s more interesting, but my way has the virtue of not sounding like retarded bullshit.

Before long you will see how realistic life on Mars can be. Some day, you may become a real Martian.

Does this woman have a problem structuring thoughts so they make sense? First off, what the hell else would you expect living on mars to be, if it’s not realistic? Does shit on Mars look like a badly rendered video game? Are the people on Mars as realistic as Max Headroom and spew off non-sensual new age hippy bullshit and the women are whorish and abundant? Second off, I hate to break it to her – but I could never become a real martian, unless moving to Mars would somehow change the space/time continuum so I wasn’t born on Earth.

I’ve had just about enough of her, look…She shouldn’t be allowed to  have a website. Shouldn’t there be some kind of governing body, ruled by people like me, who prevent this kind of thing from happening? Somebody needs to get on the ball and outlaw public stupidity, make it a capital crime, and start with Kim Komando.